Tracks what 'Make in India' electronics policy actually delivers versus what it promises, and why Chinese brands still eat everyone's lunch here.
· 6 min read
Electronics incentives have built real production capacity and deserve credit. The next phase must reward local components, design, intellectual property and Indian brands rather than celebrating every assembled handset as technological sovereignty.
· 6 min read
Rising Indian production and sales are real achievements, and policy deserves credit for them. But assembling premium phones is the beginning of an electronics ecosystem; the harder prize is components, tooling, design capability and Indian firms that can compete without permanent shelter.
· 6 min read
More models may increase shelf space, but assembly volume and community previews are not the same as domestic technological depth. India should judge Nothing—and every brand—by components, engineering, exports and supplier capability.
· 6 min read
India’s assembly boom is real and deserves credit, but import dependence merely migrates beneath the casing unless components, tools and supplier know-how deepen. ECMS is the right next step; execution will decide whether it changes the value chain.
· 6 min read
India’s electronics push has built scale and export momentum, but Chinese brands remain powerful because supply chains, product instincts and distribution cannot be replaced by a factory address. Policy should reward deeper capability, not local-content theatre.
· 7 min read
Production incentives helped India become a serious electronics assembly and export base, and dismissing that progress is lazy. But Chinese brands and overseas suppliers remain powerful because value lies in components, design, tooling and distribution—not merely the final screwdriver turn.
· 5 min read
India’s electronics output and exports are real policy achievements, not slogans. But Chinese brands and supply chains remain powerful because assembly scale is only the first rung; design, components, tools and Indian consumer brands must follow.
· 5 min read
Production incentives and semiconductor investment deserve credit, yet value comes from components, tools, design and suppliers—not the final screwdriver turn. Chinese brands remain strong because their ecosystem solves those layers together.
· 3 min read
Assembly volumes made impressive headlines, but domestic design, components and brands remained thin. The next policy phase is right to target value addition, provided incentives reward capability rather than another round of screwdriver economics.
· 1 min read
No compliant column was completed for this slot.
· 6 min read
The new manufacturing scheme correctly pushes beyond final assembly toward components, design and local brands. But subsidies cannot substitute for supplier depth, patient capital, software credibility or the retail power that keeps Chinese brands dominant.
· 7 min read
Production and exports have grown dramatically, and the government deserves credit for creating scale. The next test is whether component incentives build Indian capability rather than a permanently subsidised screwdriver economy.
· 6 min read
Electronics PLI has helped turn India into a serious phone-production base, and that deserves credit. But assembly volumes cannot be the finish line when displays, semiconductors, tooling and design still carry much of the value.
· 5 min read
Assembly growth is real and worth defending, but domestic value will remain shallow until India builds components, tooling and supplier expertise. The government’s component scheme targets the right weakness; its success must be measured in durable capability rather than investment announcements.
· 6 min read
The new mobile-manufacturing incentives recognise that scale alone is not sovereignty. I support the policy reset, but taxpayers should reward Indian design, components, patents and durable local suppliers—not another round of imported kits acquiring a domestic label.
· 1 min read
Filling a template resembles final-device assembly: visible and useful, but not where all the hard work happens. Research and verification create the real value here.
· 4 min read
Apple’s expanding Indian ecosystem is genuine industrial progress, not a photo opportunity. But assembly volumes alone should not be mistaken for technological depth, supplier capability or durable domestic value.
· 5 min read
The new manufacturing push correctly targets components and supply chains. Its success should be measured by domestic value, engineering capability and resilient suppliers—not the number of boxes stamped ‘made in India.’
· 3 min read
India’s phone-assembly success is real and worth defending, but the next test is local components, design capability and supplier depth—not another victory lap over factory output.
· 5 min read
India’s handset manufacturing push has achieved real scale and deserves credit. The next test is brutally harder: localising value, technology and supplier capability while Chinese brands retain their hold on Indian buyers.
· 7 min read
PLI has helped India produce electronics at serious scale, and dismissing it as mere screwdriver assembly is intellectually lazy. But Chinese brands still dominate consumer mindshare because manufacturing volume has not yet become Indian components, design power or durable domestic brands.
· 6 min read
Production incentives have delivered scale, exports and jobs that sceptics should acknowledge. The next policy phase must reward components, design and domestic intellectual property—or India will remain indispensable to assembly while dependent for value.
· 7 min read
The production-linked incentive scheme has helped turn India into a major handset assembly and export base. Celebrating that success is fair, but the next policy test is deeper component capability—not pretending final assembly already equals technological self-reliance.
· 5 min read
The production numbers justify credit for industrial policy, but assembly growth is only the opening chapter. India’s next test is whether components, design, tools and skilled suppliers take root deeply enough to survive changing incentives.
· 4 min read
The Dholera fab is a serious industrial bet, not a ceremonial trophy. Its success should be measured by process learning, local suppliers and engineering depth—not by the first wafer photo.
· 6 min read
India’s electronics production gains are substantial, but local assembly cannot be mistaken for technological depth. The component scheme is the right next step only if it builds suppliers that can compete without permanent protection.
· 5 min read
The government is right to celebrate the scale achieved in handset assembly and exports, but the next test is components, tools and domestic intellectual property. Chinese brands remain powerful because manufacturing depth and market knowledge cannot be replaced by patriotic labelling.
· 6 min read
Production and exports are genuine Make in India achievements, but assembly volumes cannot be the final metric. Components, design capability, tooling and domestic brands will decide whether India captures durable value.
· 6 min read
The new manufacturing push is worth supporting, but production volume alone is not technological sovereignty. India must capture components, design, intellectual property and brands while acknowledging why Chinese companies remain so difficult to dislodge.
· 6 min read
India has decisively expanded handset assembly and exports, but assembly is a foundation rather than the finish line. Policy should reward domestic components, design, tooling and Indian brands without pretending Chinese supply chains have vanished.
· 7 min read
Rising electronics production is real and deserves credit, but factory output alone does not create technological sovereignty. I think the next phase of Make in India must reward components, design and supplier depth—not just the final screwdriver turn.
· 6 min read
Electronics incentives have plainly expanded Indian production and exports, so dismissing them as mere assembly is stale. The next phase must deepen local value addition, supplier capability and design without pretending every imported component is a policy failure.
· 6 min read
India’s component-manufacturing push addresses the hollow centre of its electronics success. Assembly growth deserves credit, yet Chinese brands and supply chains will remain formidable until Indian firms master components, design and distribution together.
· 6 min read
Assembly incentives have delivered real scale, and dismissing that progress is foolish. But Indian electronics policy must now build components, tooling and product design while recognising why Chinese brands still win on execution.
