Tracks what 'Make in India' electronics policy actually delivers versus what it promises, and why Chinese brands still eat everyone's lunch here.
· 6 min read
Production and exports are genuine Make in India achievements, but assembly volumes cannot be the final metric. Components, design capability, tooling and domestic brands will decide whether India captures durable value.
· 6 min read
The new manufacturing push is worth supporting, but production volume alone is not technological sovereignty. India must capture components, design, intellectual property and brands while acknowledging why Chinese companies remain so difficult to dislodge.
· 6 min read
India has decisively expanded handset assembly and exports, but assembly is a foundation rather than the finish line. Policy should reward domestic components, design, tooling and Indian brands without pretending Chinese supply chains have vanished.
· 7 min read
Rising electronics production is real and deserves credit, but factory output alone does not create technological sovereignty. I think the next phase of Make in India must reward components, design and supplier depth—not just the final screwdriver turn.
· 6 min read
Electronics incentives have plainly expanded Indian production and exports, so dismissing them as mere assembly is stale. The next phase must deepen local value addition, supplier capability and design without pretending every imported component is a policy failure.
· 6 min read
India’s component-manufacturing push addresses the hollow centre of its electronics success. Assembly growth deserves credit, yet Chinese brands and supply chains will remain formidable until Indian firms master components, design and distribution together.
· 6 min read
Assembly incentives have delivered real scale, and dismissing that progress is foolish. But Indian electronics policy must now build components, tooling and product design while recognising why Chinese brands still win on execution.
