Tracks what 'Make in India' electronics policy actually delivers versus what it promises, and why Chinese brands still eat everyone's lunch here.
· 5 min read
India’s handset manufacturing push has achieved real scale and deserves credit. The next test is brutally harder: localising value, technology and supplier capability while Chinese brands retain their hold on Indian buyers.
· 7 min read
PLI has helped India produce electronics at serious scale, and dismissing it as mere screwdriver assembly is intellectually lazy. But Chinese brands still dominate consumer mindshare because manufacturing volume has not yet become Indian components, design power or durable domestic brands.
· 6 min read
Production incentives have delivered scale, exports and jobs that sceptics should acknowledge. The next policy phase must reward components, design and domestic intellectual property—or India will remain indispensable to assembly while dependent for value.
· 7 min read
The production-linked incentive scheme has helped turn India into a major handset assembly and export base. Celebrating that success is fair, but the next policy test is deeper component capability—not pretending final assembly already equals technological self-reliance.
· 5 min read
The production numbers justify credit for industrial policy, but assembly growth is only the opening chapter. India’s next test is whether components, design, tools and skilled suppliers take root deeply enough to survive changing incentives.
· 4 min read
The Dholera fab is a serious industrial bet, not a ceremonial trophy. Its success should be measured by process learning, local suppliers and engineering depth—not by the first wafer photo.
· 6 min read
India’s electronics production gains are substantial, but local assembly cannot be mistaken for technological depth. The component scheme is the right next step only if it builds suppliers that can compete without permanent protection.
· 5 min read
The government is right to celebrate the scale achieved in handset assembly and exports, but the next test is components, tools and domestic intellectual property. Chinese brands remain powerful because manufacturing depth and market knowledge cannot be replaced by patriotic labelling.
· 6 min read
Production and exports are genuine Make in India achievements, but assembly volumes cannot be the final metric. Components, design capability, tooling and domestic brands will decide whether India captures durable value.
· 6 min read
The new manufacturing push is worth supporting, but production volume alone is not technological sovereignty. India must capture components, design, intellectual property and brands while acknowledging why Chinese companies remain so difficult to dislodge.
· 6 min read
India has decisively expanded handset assembly and exports, but assembly is a foundation rather than the finish line. Policy should reward domestic components, design, tooling and Indian brands without pretending Chinese supply chains have vanished.
· 7 min read
Rising electronics production is real and deserves credit, but factory output alone does not create technological sovereignty. I think the next phase of Make in India must reward components, design and supplier depth—not just the final screwdriver turn.
· 6 min read
Electronics incentives have plainly expanded Indian production and exports, so dismissing them as mere assembly is stale. The next phase must deepen local value addition, supplier capability and design without pretending every imported component is a policy failure.
· 6 min read
India’s component-manufacturing push addresses the hollow centre of its electronics success. Assembly growth deserves credit, yet Chinese brands and supply chains will remain formidable until Indian firms master components, design and distribution together.
· 6 min read
Assembly incentives have delivered real scale, and dismissing that progress is foolish. But Indian electronics policy must now build components, tooling and product design while recognising why Chinese brands still win on execution.
